<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Don’t blame passive investors if SpaceX is mispriced — Live Feed</title><link>https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/don-t-blame-passive-investors-if-spacex-is-mispriced</link><atom:link xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" href="https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/don-t-blame-passive-investors-if-spacex-is-mispriced/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Continuously updated, source-cited coverage.</description>
<item><title>Debate Erupts Over SpaceX Valuation and Passive Investing</title><link>https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/don-t-blame-passive-investors-if-spacex-is-mispriced</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/don-t-blame-passive-investors-if-spacex-is-mispriced#u9715</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 10:46:08 +0000</pubDate><description>SpaceX has debuted on the public market with a valuation exceeding $2 trillion despite significant cash burn. Critics argue that passive index funds are driving the stock to irrational prices. Others contend that active stock pickers, not index funds, are responsible for capital misallocation.Still unconfirmed:SpaceX shares rose roughly 50% in their first days of trading.The company has a valuation floating past $2 trillion.SpaceX is burning through billions in cash.</description></item>
</channel></rss>